<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[California Energy Journal: Offshore Oil]]></title><description><![CDATA[An investigation into the history and politics of offshore oil drilling in California.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/s/offshore-oil-drilling</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 17:15:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[californiaenergytransition@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Philip MacFarlane]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[DOJ Removes Sable Pipeline Dispute to Federal Court]]></title><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice and Sable Offshore Corp. removed litigation over the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System from California state court to federal court, escalating an ongoing dispute over federal preemption and state permitting authority.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/doj-removes-sable-pipeline-dispute</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/doj-removes-sable-pipeline-dispute</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:09:16 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/bc9b3c3f-cfe5-4aa3-8059-99a1c7250cef_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice and Sable Offshore Corp. removed litigation over the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System from California state court to federal court, <a href="https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2026/05/18/doj-moves-fight-over-california-oil-pipeline-to-federal-bench-00924602">according</a> to E&amp;E News, escalating an ongoing dispute over federal preemption and state permitting authority. The move escalates a dispute over whether federal national security authorities and interstate pipeline regulation can override state permitting and land-use requirements tied to the restart of offshore oil production.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The U.S. Department of Justice and Sable filed a notice May 18 removing the case from Santa Barbara Superior Court after Judge Donna Geck <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/judge-upholds-injunction-against">denied</a> Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s effort to rescind the <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-issues-injunction-against-state">preliminary injunction</a> prohibiting the restart of the pipeline system.</p><p>Energy Secretary Chris Wright issued an order under the Defense Production Act directing Sable Offshore to restart the oil pipeline system. The order cited national security concerns and the need to strengthen domestic energy supply on the West Coast. Sable resumed pipeline operations shortly after the order was issued.</p><p>Sable has been working to restore production from the offshore fields and restart the Las Flores Pipeline System, arguing that federal regulatory actions and national security directives preempt additional state and local approvals.</p><p>In April, Judge Geck ruled that the federal order did not automatically invalidate the state court injunction. Geck also scheduled a May 22 hearing to consider whether Sable should be held in contempt for allegedly violating the injunction by restarting the pipeline.</p><p>Environmental groups have argued that Sable cannot legally operate the pipeline without securing county land-use permits and other state approvals. The groups said the case belongs in state court because it primarily concerns California permitting and land-use authority.</p><p>Sable and the federal government have countered that federal jurisdiction is appropriate because the case now involves federal national security determinations and interstate pipeline regulation.</p><p>In December 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulators-to-oversee-pipeline">confirmed</a> the company&#8217;s determination that the pipeline qualifies as an interstate pipeline under the Pipeline Safety Act rather than as an intrastate public subject to state regulation. The agency then <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulator-approves-sable">approved Sable&#8217;s restart plan</a> for the pipeline system.</p><p>The removal of the case to federal court adds another layer to the broader legal conflict surrounding the restart of offshore oil production tied to the Santa Ynez Unit. Oil transportation through the system has continued while state, federal, and environmental litigation proceeds.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><em>California Energy Journal</em> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Case Against BOEM Challenging Sable Restart Thrown Out]]></title><description><![CDATA[A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by two environmental groups challenging the restart of oil production on Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s three offshore platforms near Santa Barbara, ruling that the environmental groups lacked standing.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/case-against-boem-challenging-sable</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/case-against-boem-challenging-sable</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 23:09:09 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/09b30d17-37f3-46f0-9e5c-3a2cf93a4a2e_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by two environmental groups challenging the restart of oil production on Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s three offshore platforms near Santa Barbara, ruling that the environmental groups lacked standing, <a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/nonprofits-hit-seawall-in-bid-to-stop-offshore-drilling-in-california/">according</a> to <em>Courthouse News</em>.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity and the Wishtoyo Foundation <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/environmental-groups-sue-to-stop">sued</a> the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in April 2025, alleging that the agency violated the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by not requiring Sable to revise the Santa Ynez Unit&#8217;s development and production plans for the first of three offshore platforms that the company planned to restart.</p><p>The groups argued that the plans, originally approved in the 1970s and 1980s, were &#8220;woefully outdated&#8221; and did not reflect current environmental conditions or operational risks.</p><p>The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that the organizations failed to demonstrate how BOEM&#8217;s decision caused them injury sufficient to establish standing.</p><p>The court also stated that the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act gives the Department of the Interior discretion over when to revisit previously approved development and production plans. The judge stated that BOEM had already conducted a review in its April 2025 decision and that the court was &#8220;powerless to compel the secretary to conduct another review&#8230;.&#8221;</p><p>Under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, BOEM is required to seek input from local governments only for certain agency actions. The local governments, in turn, can then seek comments to include in their responses to BOEM.</p><p>The environmental groups may file an amended complaint, according to <em>Courthouse News</em>.</p><p>The three platforms are part of the Santa Ynez Unit, which has been shut since the 2015 Refugio oil spill. The Santa Ynez Unit also includes an onshore oil processing plant located in Las Flores Canyon, near Goleta, and the associated pipeline infrastructure.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><em>California Energy Journal</em> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Seeks Preliminary Injunction to Stop Sable Pipeline Restart]]></title><description><![CDATA[California filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-seeks-preliminary-injunction</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-seeks-preliminary-injunction</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 16:02:06 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/6d281286-f2d2-4576-8f40-c60e122264dd_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-seeks-halt-trump-administration%E2%80%99s-illegal-greenlight-oil">filed a motion for a preliminary injunction</a> to stop Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit. California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed the <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Sable%20PI.pdf">motion</a> on May 1, 2026, asking the court to revoke the <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/trump-administration-directs-sable">federal order</a> to restart the pipeline and to block the transportation of oil through th&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-seeks-preliminary-injunction">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[BOEM Issues Final Environmental Review for Platform Gilda Fracking Proposal]]></title><description><![CDATA[On April 22, 2026, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) issued a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to authorize well stimulation treatments, including fracking, on Platform Gilda offshore Ventura County.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-issues-final-environmental-review</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-issues-final-environmental-review</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/28b22283-bb67-4c77-89dc-ccbf88efb8fe_480x480.webp" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 22, 2026, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) <a href="https://www.boem.gov/newsroom/press-releases/boem-releases-final-environmental-impact-statement-platform-gilda-well">issued</a> a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposal to authorize well stimulation treatments, including fracking, on Platform Gilda offshore Ventura County.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The EIA completes a <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-moves-to-fast-track-environmental">fast-tracked federal review</a> of the proposed treatments on up to 16 existing wells at the platform as &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-issues-final-environmental-review">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge Upholds Injunction against Sable Oil Pipeline Restart]]></title><description><![CDATA[In a tentative ruling on April 17, 2026, a Santa Barbara County judge denied Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s effort to rescind the preliminary injunction prohibiting the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/judge-upholds-injunction-against</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/judge-upholds-injunction-against</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:14:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/2401a5f1-d025-4de2-9c7c-428848737678_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a tentative ruling on April 17, 2026, a Santa Barbara County judge <a href="https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv02244-2">denied</a> Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s effort to rescind the <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-issues-injunction-against-state">preliminary injunction</a> prohibiting the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System. The injunction against the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) requires Sable to provide advance notice before restarting onshore pipeline operatio&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/judge-upholds-injunction-against">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Challenges Federal Offshore Fracking Review]]></title><description><![CDATA[California Attorney General Rob Bonta formally opposed a federal environmental review that could authorize offshore hydraulic fracturing at Platform Gilda, arguing that the process violates federal law and longstanding court orders.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-challenges-federal-offshore</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-challenges-federal-offshore</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:10:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/c7c9328b-c735-4a1c-8892-bbb41065ebe9_480x480.webp" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Attorney General Rob Bonta formally opposed an expedited federal environmental review that could authorize offshore hydraulic fracturing at <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-offshore-platforms">Platform Gilda</a> in the Santa Barbara Channel.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The attorney general argued in a March 30, 2026 <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Comment%20on%20Platform%20Gilda%20WST.pdf">comment letter</a> that the process violates federal law and longstanding court orders. &#8220;Curtailing procedural requi&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-challenges-federal-offshore">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[BOEM Moves to Fast-Track Environmental Review for Offshore Fracking at Platform Gilda]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has initiated a fast-tracked environmental review that could allow hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, at Platform Gilda in federal waters off California.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-moves-to-fast-track-environmental</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-moves-to-fast-track-environmental</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:43:57 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/bb597c06-d15a-484f-81ca-653bec301002_480x480.webp" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has initiated a fast-tracked environmental review that could allow hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, at Platform Gilda in federal waters off California.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>In a March 18, 2026 <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/18/2026-05319/notice-of-intent-to-prepare-an-environmental-impact-statement-on-platform-gilda-well-stimulation">notice of intent</a>, BOEM said it will prepare an <a href="https://www.boem.gov/regions/pacific-ocs-region/environmental-impact-statement-platform-gilda-well-stimulation-treatment">environmental impact statement</a> (EIS) to evaluate a proposal to authorize well stimul&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-moves-to-fast-track-environmental">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Sues to Block Federal Order Restarting Sable Pipeline]]></title><description><![CDATA[California has filed suit to block a federal order directing Sable Offshore Corp. to restart the oil pipeline system serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-to-block-federal</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-to-block-federal</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/cdaabc3b-9ac8-48fb-9230-9f9f82df827c_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has filed suit to block a federal <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/trump-administration-directs-sable">order</a> directing Sable Offshore Corp. to restart the oil pipeline system serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit. The suit escalates a legal dispute over the Trump administration&#8217;s use of emergency powers to override state energy and environmental controls.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Complaint%20for%20Declaratory%20and%20Injunctive%20and%20Other%20Relief%20%5B1%5D.pdf">complaint</a> challenges the March 13, 2026 order issued &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-to-block-federal">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Brings Multiple Legal Challenges to Block Sable Pipeline Restart]]></title><description><![CDATA[California launched a legal effort to stop Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-brings-multiple-legal</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-brings-multiple-legal</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 21:40:52 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/ccfc8d44-4794-4ac1-bc8b-429105010ec4_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California launched a legal effort to stop Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System serving the offshore Santa Ynez Unit. The response to the recent restart of the pipeline system could signal an escalating conflict between California and the Trump administration over federal emergency powers and state environmental authority.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>On &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-brings-multiple-legal">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Administration Directs Sable to Restart Santa Ynez Unit Pipeline, Citing National Security]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Trump administration directed Sable Offshore Corp. on March 13, 2026 to restart the oil pipeline servicing the Santa Ynez Unit.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/trump-administration-directs-sable</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/trump-administration-directs-sable</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 03:59:46 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/b1e5b846-f7e1-464f-b8a1-f49c217d840c_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Trump administration <a href="https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-wright-directs-sable-offshore-restore-santa-ynez-unit-and-pipeline">directed</a> Sable Offshore Corp. on March 13, 2026 to restart the oil pipeline system serving the Santa Ynez Unit offshore oil field, citing national security concerns and the need to strengthen domestic energy supply on the West Coast.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>Under the directive, Sable <a href="https://sableoffshore.com/news/news-details/2026/Sable-Resumes-Oil-Flow-as-Ordered-by-the-Federal-DPA-with-Expected-Gross-Oil-Rate-of-50000-Bblsd-and-Expects-First-Sales-by-April-1-2026/default.aspx">began transporting oil</a> from the Santa Ynez Unit through the Las Flores&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/trump-administration-directs-sable">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[DOJ Says Defense Production Act Order Could Override State Barriers to Oil Production and Pipeline Operation]]></title><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Justice issued a legal opinion concluding that a presidential order on energy production issued under the Defense Production Act (DPA) could preempt conflicting state laws under the Constitution&#8217;s Supremacy Clause.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/justice-department-says-defense-production</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/justice-department-says-defense-production</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 01:13:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/e552a53c-1907-4108-923c-11b50ca0d199_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice issued a <a href="https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1429671/dl?inline">legal opinion</a> concluding that a presidential order on energy production issued under the Defense Production Act (DPA) could preempt conflicting state laws under the Constitution&#8217;s Supremacy Clause. The U.S. Department of Energy requested the opinion in connection with Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s ongoing efforts to rest&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/justice-department-says-defense-production">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Timeline: Sable Offshore and the Las Flores Pipeline System]]></title><description><![CDATA[Updates on legal and regulatory developments.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/timeline-sable-offshore-and-the-las</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/timeline-sable-offshore-and-the-las</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 05:14:08 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/1f13eed5-dbde-496e-bdba-16d8f74091fc_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>2015 &#8211; Refugio Oil Spill Shuts Down Santa Ynez Unit</strong></h3><p><strong>May 19, 2015</strong><br>A crude oil pipeline owned by Plains All American Pipeline (Line 901) ruptures near Refugio State Beach, spilling about 142,000 gallons of oil along the Santa Barbara coast.</p><p>Following the spill, ExxonMobil suspends production from the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) offshore platforms and the Las Flore&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/timeline-sable-offshore-and-the-las">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Court Upholds Injunction Blocking Restart of Sable Offshore Pipeline]]></title><description><![CDATA[On February 27, 2026, Santa Barbara County Judge Donna Geck intends to uphold a preliminary injunction that blocks Sable&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline system.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-upholds-injunction-that-prevents</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-upholds-injunction-that-prevents</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 03:56:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/02a28924-1b2b-485f-a64c-f5fca9511b2b_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 27, 2026, Santa Barbara County Judge Donna Geck <a href="https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv02244-1">intends to uphold</a> a preliminary injunction that blocks Sable&#8217;s restart of the Las Flores Pipeline system.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>Sable challenged a July 2025 <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-issues-injunction-against-state">preliminary injunction </a>against the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM), finding that it likely violated state law in its approval of a waiver that allowed Sa&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-upholds-injunction-that-prevents">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[BOEM Launches Environmental Review for Potential California Offshore Lease Sales]]></title><description><![CDATA[BOEM announced that it will begin preparing a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) for potential oil and gas lease sales off the coast of California.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-launches-environmental-review</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-launches-environmental-review</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 04:34:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/8796d7f6-16ce-4a85-98a6-1039edd1a364_1350x1740.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) <a href="https://www.boem.gov/newsroom/press-releases/boem-announces-intent-prepare-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement">announced</a> that it will begin preparing a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) for potential oil and gas lease sales off the coast of California. The review encompasses the Northern, Central and Southern California Planning Areas of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The action, published as &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/boem-launches-environmental-review">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Feds Subpoenaed Sable over Inside Information, Records Show]]></title><description><![CDATA[Sable Offshore Corp. received subpoenas in December 2025 from the U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-subpoenaed-sable-over-inside</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-subpoenaed-sable-over-inside</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:33:49 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/6a5254bc-f40b-4555-86e9-007608b39e9d_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sable Offshore Corp. received subpoenas in December 2025 from the U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), seeking documents related to trading in the company&#8217;s securities and issues raised in an October 31, 2025 <a href="https://hntrbrk.com/sable-2/">investigative report</a> by Hunterbrook Media. The subpoenas add&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-subpoenaed-sable-over-inside">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal Review Opens Path to New Oil Drilling Off the Coast of California]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) on January 26, 2026 issued two Calls for Information and Nominations covering previously protected federal waters off Southern and Central California.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-review-opens-path-to-new</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-review-opens-path-to-new</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 05:10:26 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/4c0f4787-ffa0-4b8c-8d37-a1a114dd05c3_300x169.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) on January 26, 2026 <a href="https://www.boem.gov/newsroom/press-releases/boem-invites-public-input-potential-offshore-oil-and-gas-leasing-areas">issued</a> two Calls for Information and Nominations covering previously protected federal waters off Southern and Central California. The notices begin a preliminary review under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and invite public and industry input on environmental conditions, potential &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-review-opens-path-to-new">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[California Sues Trump Administration over Sable Pipeline Approval]]></title><description><![CDATA[California is suing the federal government for taking regulatory authority over Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s Las Flores Pipeline System.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-trump-administration</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-trump-administration</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:10:36 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/053b8404-bd5b-498f-bd5b-e46103c87d7e_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California is <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/PFR%20with%20Exhibits%20and%20Certificate%20of%20Service.pdf">suing</a> the federal government for taking <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulators-to-oversee-pipeline">regulatory authority</a> over Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s Las Flores Pipeline System. The pipeline, which was shut down following the 2015 Refugio oil spill, is critical to restarting oil production in the Santa Ynez Unit.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>In a petition filed on January 23, 2026, California challenged three actions by the fede&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/california-sues-trump-administration">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Court Rejects Emergency Appeal to Stop Pipeline Restart]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an attempt to stay the approval of Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s pipeline restart plan.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-rejects-emergency-appeal-to</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-rejects-emergency-appeal-to</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 21:25:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/89f22b73-0820-4d7c-9595-921e9a54e07d_768x411.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="https://keyt.b-cdn.net/2025/12/sable-appeal-order.pdf">rejected</a> an attempt to stay the approval of Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s pipeline restart plan. The lawsuit will proceed on an expedited basis with opening briefs due January 26, 2025.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>Environmental groups <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-grant-sable-emergency-waiver">sued</a> the Trump administration on December 24, 2025 over its approval of Sable&#8217;s request for an &#8220;emergency&#8221; waiver from fe&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/court-rejects-emergency-appeal-to">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Feds Grant Sable “Emergency” Waiver for Pipeline Restart, Environmental Groups Sue]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Trump administration approved Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s request for an &#8220;emergency&#8221; waiver from federal safety regulations over the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-grant-sable-emergency-waiver</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-grant-sable-emergency-waiver</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 20:30:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/6e904dc9-0541-4d27-ae7d-2a12afe544f7_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Trump administration <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/PHMSA-2025-1502/document">approved</a> Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s request for an &#8220;emergency&#8221; waiver from federal safety regulations over the restart of the Las Flores Pipeline System. Environmental groups then <a href="https://biologicaldiversity.org/programs/oceans/pdfs/2025-12-24_Trump-admin-Sable-pipeline-restart.pdf">sued</a> the administration over the approval, contending that the administration bypassed federal requirements in its approval of the pipeline restart plan a&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/feds-grant-sable-emergency-waiver">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal Regulator Approves Sable Pipeline Restart Plans]]></title><description><![CDATA[The federal regulator approved Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s Las Flores Pipeline System, a critical step in restarting oil production in the Santa Ynez Unit.]]></description><link>https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulator-approves-sable</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulator-approves-sable</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:58:03 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/7c393657-3bc7-4f72-a469-4cf3e11ed3a0_624x310.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal regulator approved Sable Offshore Corp.&#8217;s restart plan for its Las Flores Pipeline System, a critical step in restarting oil production in the Santa Ynez Unit. The pipeline system connects the Santa Ynez Unit to the Pentland Station terminal in Kern County.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p><p>The U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administ&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.californiaenergytransition.com/p/federal-regulator-approves-sable">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>